Table of Contents Hide
When the popular social media website Facebook started out, it was a free service that gave users the ability to create a profile and interact with other users through regular updates and messages. As the number of Facebook users swelled, so did the number of people in need of a free, secure, and reliable way to communicate safely with friends and family. Above the Fold: In this digital age, Internet privacy is a very sensitive issue, and many people are exposed to content that they may not want to see. For people who are concerned about their privacy, Facebook is an incredibly useful tool to check in with friends, send a message, or perform a search without having to worry about being monitored.
Facebook has always been the most popular social media. Facebook is changing a lot of features, such as the News Feed, News Ticker, and we are going to see many other things. But, Facebook is not the only social media, and there are others. We are going to see a lot of changes on other social media. We are going to see more information about the people we are following. We are going to see people who are not following us. We are going to see the ads they are not following us. We are going to see ads about things we are interested in. We are going to see ads about things they are interested in. We are going to see ads about things we are not interested in. We are going to
Facebook has deactivated the accounts of two New York University (NYU) academics and concluded its inquiry into disinformation spread via political advertisements on the social media platform.
According to Facebook, the researchers broke its terms of service by collecting data from its enormous network without permission. Academics, on the other hand, claim that the business is attempting to restrict research that presents it in a bad light. As part of the Ad Observatory Project, NYU researchers have been analyzing Facebook’s ad library, which allows users to search for advertisements appearing on Facebook products, for many years.
According to Laura Edelson, a senior researcher at NYU Cybersecurity for Democracy, “the researchers used the access to uncover systemic flaws in Facebook’s ad library, to identify misinformation in political ads, including many ads that raise distrust of our electoral system, and to study whether Facebook amplifies partisan political misinformation.” “Facebook’s move against the NYU study has prevented other academics and journalists from accessing Facebook data,” Edelson added.
The researchers provided a web browser plug-in tool for Facebook users to freely give up their data, which revealed how the social network targeted political advertising. Facebook, on the other hand, claims that the browser extension was designed to evade its detection mechanisms and collect user data, creating privacy issues.
Facebook claimed it “takes unauthorised data harvesting seriously” and that “when we discover instances of data harvesting, we investigate them and take measures to safeguard our platform” in a blog post published late Tuesday night. Edelson and another researcher, Damon McCoy, received a warning letter from Facebook in October, but their accounts were only closed on Tuesday, hours after Edelson informed the platform that he and McCoy were studying the spread of disinformation on the platform about the 6 January attack on the US Capitol, according to the researchers.
The Blue House is under attack.
According to Mike Clark, Facebook’s director of product management, the Menlo Park, California-based business encourages research that keeps it responsible while without jeopardizing the platform’s security or users’ privacy. “While the Ad Observatory initiative may have good intentions,” he said, “the continuing data breach cannot be overlooked and must be addressed.”
At least two Democratic senators have voiced their displeasure with Facebook’s decision. The technological platform “should be collaborating with independent researchers and providing them greater power to do so,” according to Virginia’s Mark Warner, but the business “appears to have done the reverse.” Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota expressed concern over Facebook’s decision to restrict academics’ access to political ad data, claiming that it “shows that the corporation continues to sell millions of dollars worth of political advertisements without sufficient transparency.”
Facebook claims to make political ad data accessible via its ad library and to offer academics with “privacy-protected datasets” through other methods.
BBC News is the source of this information.
This article broadly covered the following related topics:
- facebook censorship
- facebook censorship 2018
- facebook censoring my posts
- facebook censorship policy
- facebook censorship meme